The European Union’s ‘Fit for 55’ climate strategy announced this month shows how all-encompassing and unprecedented the effort to curb climate change will be. Targeting a 55% reduction in annual carbon emissions by the end of the decade compared with 1990, this implies the strategy aims to cut emissions by around a third by the end of the decade.

 

It is important to remember that this represents the minimum required to avoid dangerous levels of climate change that would undermine global development on all fronts. It will be almost impossible to tackle poverty, inequality or to improve standards of healthcare provision and education if we do not also make rapid progress to avoid further damage to the environment on which we all depend.


This underpins a growing consensus – consumers, voters, politicians, regulators and some executives – for action. In terms of scale, the proportion of global GDP covered by national-level net-zero targets amounts to two-thirds of global GDP, including commitments from China, the US, Japan and South Korea. It also covers over 61% of global emissions and 56% of the world’s population.

From zero to two-thirds

Compelling opportunity

This unprecedented challenge also represents a compelling investment opportunity – providing capital to the companies that can enable the transition to net-zero carbon emissions. These are companies focused on providing the critical products and services to help businesses deliver on their emissions targets. We believe these environmental solutions companies over time will offer long-term outperformance as their markets expand rapidly.

 

A growing seam of opportunity for these companies stems from ever-more sophisticated corporate net zero ambitions. Just over a fifth of the Forbes Global 2000, or 417 companies, generating annual sales of about $14 trillion, have made a commitment to net zero emissions, most before 2050.

Corporate sector climate commitment

Companies aiming to meet net zero targets will require a whole ‘lifecycle’ approach, including tackling upstream emissions (from suppliers) as well as downstream emissions that capture the all-important emissions from a product’s ‘use phase’. What is encouraging is that these ‘Scope 3’ emissions are recognised by initiatives such as the UN’s ‘Race to Zero’ as a necessary rather than a desirable element of corporate net zero ambitions. Research from the University of Oxford and the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit found that over a quarter of the sales of companies within the Forbes Global 2000 that have a net zero target already to cover this level of detail.

 

In our view, this is already beginning to send powerful signals through value chains, providing opportunities for those companies with enabling technologies to reduce the climate intensity of supply chains towards net zero. Furthermore, many of these opportunities are in industries that have so far seen limited progress when compared to those that are already making strides, such as the energy and automotive sectors.

 

This will take time. Supply chain decarbonization is picking up pace but is not commonplace and is distinctly challenging. While a manufacturer can calculate the greenhouse gas emissions from its own operations with a relatively high degree of confidence, getting a view on Scope 3 emissions is very complex, especially for companies with thousands or even tens of thousands of products and suppliers.

Steady stream

Many emission-reduction measures are also expensive and difficult for companies operating in relatively commoditised spaces with slim margins and few opportunities for differentiation.


Nevertheless, we are starting to see a steady stream of opportunities emerge. This can be in pockets of the market where a small increase in raw material prices is manageable, such as when a fast-moving consumer goods company can substitute carbon-intensive ingredients. This provides potential opportunities for ingredients companies in the chemical sector, which can dramatically benefit from margin uplift if they have a differentiating product that can help in the transition to net zero.

 

There is a Norwegian company that produces synthetic vanilla flavouring from sustainable wood-based materials as an alternative to petroleum-based vanilla flavourings that is the food industry norm. The wood-based product offers carbon reduction on a life-cycle basis of about 90% versus the oil-based ingredient. This category is growing well over 10% a year compared to the 1% per year growth of oil-based synthetic vanilla.

 

In summary, net zero carbon ambitions will absolutely require environmental solutions, and we will need more solutions spread widely across sectors. Companies that make or have exposure to these products and services will have a heightened profile, reflecting the urgency of climate mitigation plans. We believe these are long-term opportunities, and they are not just limited to higher profile solutions such as electric vehicles or clean energy.

 

We expect to see environmental solutions with a wider array of potential exposures, including markets and sectors that are very under penetrated. We also expect to see continued growth in the depth and diversity of the opportunity set, and this will provide a very healthy stock picking environment into the long term.

Important information

 

The value of active minds – Independent thinking: A key feature of Jupiter’s investment approach is that we eschew the adoption of a house view, instead preferring to allow our specialist fund managers to formulate their own opinions on their asset class. As a result, it should be noted that any views expressed – including on matters relating to environmental, social and governance considerations – are those of the author(s), and may differ from views held by other Jupiter investment professionals.

 

This communication is intended for investment professionals* and is not for the use or benefit of other persons, including retail investors. This communication is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Market and exchange rate movements can cause the value of an investment to fall as well as rise, and you may get back less than originally invested. The views expressed are those of the author at the time of writing, are not necessarily those of Jupiter as a whole and may be subject to change. This is particularly true during periods of rapidly changing market circumstances. Every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of any information provided but no assurances or warranties are given.

 

Issued in the UK by Jupiter Asset Management Limited, registered address: The Zig Zag Building, 70 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6SQ is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Issued in the EU by Jupiter Asset Management International S.A. (JAMI, the Management Company), registered address: 5, Rue Heienhaff, Senningerberg L-1736, Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier.No part of this article may be reproduced in any manner without the prior permission of JAM. 27769.

 

*In Hong Kong, investment professionals refer to Professional Investors as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong).and in Singapore, Institutional Investors as defined under Section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.