Unpacking a disappointing few months for the Jupiter Gold & Silver fund, silver has been weaker than gold since July (as one would expect in a market where flows continue to dribble to a near standstill) and the fund’s positioning (around 50:50 gold/silver) has led to relative underperformance, much in the same way that periods of relatively strong performance tend to be seen with a falling gold/silver ratio.


Q2 reporting from mining companies was stronger than in Q1 (which was a tough quarter) and we expect relatively robust reporting in Q3. Operating performance at mining company level is in contrast to the wider sentiment towards the precious metals, which remains weak after a period of retail capitulation that has gone on since the spring. Institutional and trend-following investors (hedge funds and long-only) left more or less as a group in late 2020 after a brief visit to the sector, but retail and strategic longs stayed in until around April/May this year when retail too started to throw the towel in. All of this has left mining equity valuations depressed, but also ready to move strongly higher given low trading volume.


The monetary metals themselves, as well as the fund, are and continue to be driven by the movement of real interest rate expectations. In the bond market the further emphasis on tightening measures (both tapering and market assumptions regarding future rate hikes) at Fed meetings and Jackson Hole have kept investors in a marginally hawkish mindset. In addition to that, the bond market continues to price inflation as ‘transitory’.


The assumptions necessary to justify the recent performance (of both gold/silver and the fund) are:


1. inflation is just transitory
2. tapering is coming soon, and
3. rate hikes are also coming.


If just one of these assumptions falls away, then the fund and sector should rally. Personally, my view is that it is more likely that all 3 assumptions are wrong than all 3 are right. The fund remains positioned mainly in FCF-positive gold and silver producers in better quality jurisdictions alongside some well-funded developers and explorers.


It has been a frustrating year – inflation seemingly everywhere, growing central bank balance sheets and geopolitical stress all making it look like the sector should benefit from a macro tailwind that has yet to be reflected in markets. While the global cash and bond market holds the above assumptions about policy and inflation to be true we will struggle to capture momentum. It is possible, of course, that inflation disappears rapidly, tapering is bigger and faster than expected, with larger and sooner rate hikes. My guess, however, is that these central bank promises of hawkishness and unwinding – and their protest that inflation is ‘just a blip’ – will end up being just ‘guidance’ that fell away in the face of the huge systemic issues that remain unresolved.

The value of Active Minds

The value of active minds: independent thinking


A key feature of Jupiter’s investment approach is that we eschew the adoption of a house view, instead preferring to allow our specialist fund managers to formulate their own opinions on their asset class. As a result, it should be noted that any views expressed – including on matters relating to environmental, social and governance considerations – are those of the author(s), and may differ from views held by other Jupiter investment professionals.


Risk factors 

Investment risk – there is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its objective. A capital loss of some or all of the amount invested may occur.


Strategy risk – as the Fund invests in other collective investment schemes, which themselves invest in assets such as bonds, company shares, cash and currencies, it will be subject to the collective risks of these other funds.This may include emerging markets risk and smaller companies risk.


Sector concentration risk – the Fund’s investments are concentrated in natural resource companies, and may be subject to a greater degree of risk and volatility than a fund following a more diversified strategy. Silver tends to outperform gold in a rising gold price environment and it tends to underperform gold when sentiment moves against the sector.


Company shares (i.e. equities) risk – the value of Company shares (i.e. equities) and similar investments may go down as well as up in response to the performance of individual companies and can be affected by daily stock market movements and general market conditions. Other influential factors include political, economic news, company earnings and significant corporate events.


Concentration risk (number of investments) – the Fund may at times hold a smaller number of investments, and therefore a fall in the value of a single investment may have a greater impact on the Fund’s value than if it held a larger number of investments.


Smaller companies risk – smaller companies are subject to greater risk and reward potential. Investments may be volatile or difficult to buy or sell.


Liquidity risk – some investments may become hard to value or sell at a desired time and price. In extreme circumstances this may affect the Fund’s ability to meet
redemption requests upon demand.


Currency risk – the Fund can be exposed to different currencies. The value of your shares may rise and fall as a result of exchange rate movements.


Derivative risk – the Fund may use derivatives to generate returns as well as to reduce costs and/or the overall risk of the Fund. Using derivatives can involve a higher level of risk. A small movement in the price of an underlying investment may result in a disproportionately large movement in the price of the derivative investment. Derivatives also involve counterparty risk where the institutions acting as counterparty to derivatives may not meet their contractual obligations.


For a more detailed explanation of risks, please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of the prospectus.


Past performance